ccnylogo
138th St./Amsterdam Ave.
New York, NY 10031
WAC
@ City

students

 

The City College Writing Fellows Program

 

Located in the:
Center for Teaching and Learning
NAC 4/220
Phone: 212-650-6818
Email: wac@ccny.cuny.edu

 

Home
Teaching with Writing
Course Projects
WAC Resources
Assessment

 

 

 

cuelogo

Coordinated Undergraduate Education

 

Assessment of the WAC @ City Program

Student perspectives of the value of WAC at City:
Survey results from fall 2003 to fall 2005

From fall 2003 to fall 2005 four hundred fifty seven students enrolled in humanities and social science courses in which their professor collaborated with a CCNY writing fellow were surveyed about their perceptions of how WAC principles had improved their writing. Four major aspects of student writing were evaluated, overall improvement in writing, amount of writing, drafting of writing assignments, and impact of writing on comprehension of course material. In general, surveyed students reported that exposure to WAC principles improved their overall writing, increase the amount of their writing and lead them to draft more.

Detailed results


Overall improvement


Amount of writing


Drafting before and after WAC


Help understanding course material


Overall writing improvement

Of the 457 students surveyed, only 1 student reported that their writing was significantly worse following exposure to WAC*, and approximately 21% of the students reported no change in their writing. However, the majority of students reported that they experienced some improvement in their writing as a result of WAC.

Table 1. Students' responses to the question "My writing has _______ in this course."

Reported improvement

Number of students reporting

Percentage of total sample

 

 

 

Stayed about the same

99

21.7

Improved

244

53.5

Significantly improved

69

15.1

Total

412

90.4

 

* This student's data was removed because it exerted too great an influence on the normal curve of the data.
Total sample = 457
Number of students who did not respond to the question = 44 (9.6% of total sample)




Amount of writing

A little over half of the students surveyed (55.9%) reported that they wrote more in their writing fellow assisted course than they did in their other courses. About one-third of the students reported that the amount of writing they did in their writing fellow assisted course was about the same as it was in their other courses.

Table 2. Students' response to the question "The amount of writing I have been doing in this course is ____ the amount of writing I usually do in other courses."

Amount of writing reported

Number of students reporting

Percentage of total sample

Much less

8

1.9

Less

35

7.7

About the same

140

30.6

More

125

27.4

Much more

107

23.4

Total sample = 457
Number of students who did not respond to the question = 42 (9.4% of total sample)


Drafting before and after WAC

Students' reported that they wrote non-required drafts of their papers more often after exposure to WAC than they did before it. Moreover, statistical analysis showed that this difference was statistically significant; the number of student who did not draft decreased after WAC exposure, and the number of student who did draft increased. Survey results showed a 5.25% decrease in students who reported never drafting prior to WAC exposure, and a 13.79% decrease in those who reported almost never drafting. In contrast, students who reported almost always drafting increased 3.94% andstudents who reported always drafting increased 7.22%.

Table 3. Comparison of student's self-reported drafting before and after WAC

Drafting reported

Before WAC

After WAC

Percent change

Never

45

21

-5.25

Almost never

84

41

-13.79

Occasionally

120

134

3.64

Almost always

95

113

3.94

Always

68

99

7.22


 



Help understanding course material

A very small minority of students (9.8%) reported that writing did not help their understanding of course material*. But, in general students overwhelmingly reported that writing increased their understanding of course material. Ninety percent of the students surveyed felt that writing somehow improved their understanding of course material.

Table 4. Students' response to the question "The writing I have done for this course has _____ my understanding of the material."

Amount of writing reported

Number of students reporting

Percentage of total sample

Slightly interfered with

4

1.0

Had no impact on

36

8.8

Slightly increased

177

43.4

Greatly increased

191

46.8

* One student's data was removed because it exerted too great an influence on the normal curve of the data - i.e. acted as an outlier.
Total sample = 457
Number of students who did not respond to the question = 48 (10.5% of total sample)

 

 

 

 
If you have problems with this site, or suggestions for us, write wac@ccny.cuny.edu and put "Attn: Webmaster" in subject line.