COOPERATIVE OR SMALL GROUP LEARNING

Ellen Goldstein
As teachers we are always learning and exploring ways to help students
understand the subject matter we are teaching. An effective teacher applies
diverse teaching techniques at different times. Cooperative or small group
learning is one technique that promotes active student participation in
the learning process. One can find different practical examples of small
group learning at City College and at other colleges in the City University
system.
We know from the literature and research that cooperative or small group
learning:
- increases students' learning and achievements through active participation
- develops higher-level intellectual reasoning and problem-solving skills
- develops positive attitudes towards others and the subject area
- reduces students' isolation through teamwork.
Following are short synapses of some articles and web sites that will be
helpful to someone attempting to implement small group or cooperative learning.
Articles and Books
Synthesis of Research on Cooperative Learning by Robert Slavin
presents the historical development of cooperative learning and an overview
of recent research. He describes the frustration that the traditional, competitive
structure of our educational system creates and points out that a program
based on cooperative learning "has to be engineered" to be successful.
Slavin compares the different methods (TGT, Jigsaw, STAD) and summarizes
the results of twenty-seven studies that investigated the effects of cooperative
learning. The results of the research clearly show that cooperative learning
has to be well designed and must incorporate individual and team accountability.
They also show an increase of achievements and improvements in positive
inter-group relations of students. Slavin feels strongly that students should
be true partners in the learning process instead of simple consumers and
hopes that this will allow us to achieve educational outcomes far beyond
those now considered possible.
A Handbook for Teachers in Universities and Colleges by David Newble
and Robert Cannon. In Chapter Three, the authors review the educational
philosophy of small group learning and provide practical approaches for
the implementation of small group teaching. Again they reiterate that tasks
have to be clearly defined. They point out that the role of the teacher
has to change from an authoritarian style leadership to one that is faciliatory.
The learning environment has to be non-threatening and trusting and the
physical environment should allow for small group meetings. Newble and Cannon
also provide some helpful suggestions on how to approach a variety of difficulties
encountered during group interaction, furnish suggestions for some alternative
group discussion techniques, such as one-to-one discussion or buzz groups,
and give examples of both informal and formal evaluation.
Internet
I used Alta Vista to perform an Internet search. Using "cooperative
learning" as key words (as a phrase) in the general search produced
over forty-thousand listings. By using the advanced search engine and specifying
"cooperative learning in science education", nine sites were listed.
Here are some of the useful web sites I found in my search:
Selected ERIC Abstracts on Cooperative Learning (http://www.ascd.org/services/eric/ericcoo.html)
This listing provides a good cross-section of research and applications
on cooperative learning approaches. The first abstract on the list actually
points out that cooperative and collaborative learning are related but use
different processes. If one wants to understand some of these differences,
a good web site to visit is the Cooperative/Collaborative Learning
- CCL (http://www2.emc.maricopa.edu/innovation/CCL/CCLmodel.html).
Cooperative Learning in Post Secondary Education: Implications From Social
Psychology for Active Learning Experience (http://miavx1.muohio.edu/~lwsherman/area906.html)
This paper was originally presented at the annual meeting of the American
Educational Research Association in Chicago in 1991 and revised in 1996.
The paper presents some examples of cooperative pedagogical strategies which
are being used in higher education and examines how experiential learning
affects the learner.
Research on Cooperative Learning and Achievement: What We Know, What We
Need to Know by Robert E. Slavin (http://scov.csos.jhu.edu/sfa/cooplear.html)
is a paper that examines four major theoretical perspectives on cooperative
learning and achievement. Slavin also identifies some of the needs for additional
research.
Practical Examples
Implementing cooperative or small group learning is always part of our year-long
teacher enhancement programs. Some of our middle school teachers are practicing
cooperative learning in their classrooms, others tried, but were not successful,
and a third group admits that they are afraid of trying it, since they fear
chaos and loss of control. When discussing reasons for failure, one of the
most common elements seems to be the time span teachers allow for it to
succeed. We agreed that one has to try at least twenty times before giving
up. Another common reason for failure is poor planning.
In my professional development programs, I like to create an awareness of
students' different learning styles. To achieve this goal, I use a short
learning style instrument and students identify their dominant learning
style. When students break up into workshop groups, we make sure that each
group has members representing the different learning styles. Once the groups
start working on their projects, they begin to identify the differences
in their individual learning styles. They share their knowledge either through
journal reflections or through restructuring their approach to teaching
and learning in their own classrooms.
When implementing cooperative learning, one has to experiment, develop a
comfort zone, and adjust to the learning needs and styles of the students.
Ellen Goldstein
NASA Educational Resource Center
NAC Building, Room R5/302
(212) 650-6798
E-mail: gold3100@con2.com